http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000Jr

Zatial som este niekde nenasie poriadne data na rakoviny pred 20 ,50 a povedzme 100 rokmi. Musim sa spoliehat len na ustnu tradiciu od mojich rodicov a prarodicov, ktori mi povedali mnohokrat, ze v minulosti bolo tej rakoviny podstatne menej a ja by som niekedy rad urobil korelaciu medzi rakovinami a chemikaliami/liekmi a priemyselne znicenymi potravinami.
Zialbohu taketo data aj ked existuju su proti zaujmom medickej komunity, potravinarskeho priemyslu a samozrejme farmacie a chemickeho priemyslu, takze sa ich snazia z internetu vymazat alebo zatlacit co najdalej.

Napriklad korelacia medzi umelymi hormonami a rakovimou prs je mi znama aj z vlastnej skusenosti. Tato bola pred vyrobou hormonalnych prostriedkov(lieky antikoncepcie) dost zriedkava a dnes je hroziva znacnemu percentu zien.

Ak niekto najde nejake tabulky, data z minulosti na rakoviny, velmi by som to privital.

Technicke data, ktore latky sa kedy patentovali a ktore latky sa kedy zaviedli do pouzivania, to sa da najst lahsie

Data na alergie nepotrebujem, sam si pamatam z mojej mladosti v patdesiatych rokoch , ked sme boli 2 triedy cely mesiac v "skole prirody", kde sme sa spolocne stravovali a zili vo velkych ubykaciach, nepamatam sa na ziadne podstatne alergie, okrem trochu sennej nadchy.
Dnes maju v triedach tu v USA registrovane vyse 50 % deti z roznymi potravinovymi alergiami,niektore velmi vazne, tj nieco sa radikalne muselo zmenit na zamoreni a funkcii tela a zatial sa na to nepoukazuje, lebo by to zrejme siahalo na niekoho ekonomicke zaujmy.
 Ako vsade, za vsetkym dianim su zrejme peniaze....
Toxiny a rozne mikroby vedu k zvysovaniu poctu znetvorenych buniek a ked
pocet vytvorenych presiahne kapacitu tela ich znicit, vytvori sa nador.
Preto treba infekcie adresovat, tak isto zapaly z nich vyplyvajuce a cas
na to je "nie zajtra, ale vcera", tj obrazne povedane, netreba cakat a
treba sa zacat branit co najskor, kym je poskodenie minimalne.
Spomeniem sirokospektralne antimikrobialne:citricidal, oreganovy olej,
extrakt z olivovych listov, graviola, lapacho, collostrum...
Antiviralne som spomenul mnohokrat:
podla poradia ucinnosti
zinok, selen, Lactobacilus bulgaricus, aloe vera, L-lysin, echinacea,
baza, astragalus, GSE, lapacho, extrakt z olivovych listov a
najsilnejsi, co poznam, chaparal.Tiez huba chaga a betulin=extrakt z
brezovej kory.
Protizapalove:
curcumin, quercitin, bromelain, boswelin, GLA, aswagadha, triphala, a
samozrejme rozne cistiace enzymy a VODA!
Protiparaziticke:najma protokol dr Huldy Clark.
Odmorovanie tela sa prevadza enzymami, chelaciou a absorbciou
Chelacia je na toxicke tazke kovy a absorbcia na rozne toxiny v
crevach(mikrovlakniny ako psylium, pektiny arabinogalaktany,tiez aktivne
uhlie=drevenne, bentonity zeolity), a v pripade tekutych zeolitov aj v
samotnych bunkach celeho tela.
Iodine Treatment: Mary’s Success Story
Mary was a 56-year-old psychologist who
had noticed a dimpling of her left breast. Upon
examination, she found that there was an unnatural
fullness in the area. Mary’s doctor ordered a
mammogram, which showed a one-centimeter
mass, but it was ill-defined due to Mary’s dense
breast tissue. (Mammograms can be unreliable in
women with dense breast tissue, which is actually
very common.)
The doctor conducted a needle biopsy of the
mass, which was diagnosed as infiltrative ductal
carcinoma — breast cancer. Mary’s oncologist
ordered a full workup, including an MRI and a
bone scan. The MRI reported multiple (20-30)
nodular lesions in each breast, but at that point the
radiologist wasn’t sure if the lesions were a result
of breast cancer. The rest of Mary’s workup was
negative; there were no signs of cancer in any other
part of her body.
Mary’s case was presented at the hospital tumor
board, a weekly meeting of oncologists, radiologists,
and surgeons to discuss difficult cases and try to
come to a consensus on the appropriate treatment.
The board decided (unanimously) that Mary
should undergo a bilateral mastectomy, followed by
chemotherapy and radiation.
When Mary’s doctor told her about the tumor
board’s recommendation, she was stunned. “My
first thought was, ‘You can’t be serious.’ I felt fine. I
knew I had a problem, but I couldn’t believe it was
that severe,” she said. Mary needed a second opinion.
That was when she called me.
I immediately told Mary to take more iodine.
At the time, she was taking 12.5 mg/day of a
combination of iodine and iodide (one pill of a
brand called Iodoral). I told her to increase the dose
to 50 mg/day (four pills).
Six weeks later, Mary had another MRI done on
her breasts. All of the lesions were gone, and Mary
hadn’t done anything different except for taking
larger amounts of iodine. When the oncologist
reported this good news, he also told her that she
did not need a bilateral mastectomy.
Mary was, of course, thrilled. She called to tell me
that my recommendation had saved her breasts. Yet
when I asked Mary if the oncologist was interested
in hearing more about treating breast cancer with
iodine, she answered, “No, he wasn’t.”
In fact, there is a long history in the medical literature
of treating and preventing breast diseases with
iodine. The relationship between iodine and fibrocystic
breast disease, which is a precursor to breast
cancer, has been written about for over 60 years.
Iodine deficiency has been shown to alter the
normal architecture of the breast tissue in the
same way that it alters the normal architecture of
all glandular tissue. Indeed, not only can iodine
deficiency cause problems with the breasts, but it can
also disrupt the normal functioning of the thyroid,
ovaries, uterus, and prostate.
I was thrilled to hear Mary’s good news and her
improved prognosis. But I was disappointed to find
out that her doctors had practically ignored the
treatment that saved her from an emotionally and
physically painful surgery. I can only wonder why
they didn’t want to learn.
Iodine Deficiency and Breast Cancer
Iodine is essential for the body. We cannot live
without it. Unfortunately, we are experiencing a massive
epidemic of iodine deficiency in this country.
Over the last 30 years, iodine levels have fallen 50
percent in the United States,7 leading to epidemics
of thyroid problems (hypothyroid, autoimmune
thyroid diseases such as Graves’ and Hashimoto’s
disease) and breast illnesses (fibrocystic breasts and
breast cancer). All of these conditions can be related
to iodine deficiency.
In my own experience, over 95 percent of my
new patients are iodine deficient. Is it any wonder
that these patients suffer from thyroid and breast
illnesses?
http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=0000Jr

Zatial som este niekde nenasie poriadne data na rakoviny pred 20 ,50 a povedzme 100 rokmi. Musim sa spoliehat len na ustnu tradiciu od mojich rodicov a prarodicov, ktori mi povedali mnohokrat, ze v minulosti bolo tej rakoviny podstatne menej a ja by som niekedy rad urobil korelaciu medzi rakovinami a chemikaliami/liekmi a priemyselne znicenymi potravinami.
Zialbohu taketo data aj ked existuju su proti zaujmom medickej komunity, potravinarskeho priemyslu a samozrejme farmacie a chemickeho priemyslu, takze sa ich snazia z internetu vymazat alebo zatlacit co najdalej.

Napriklad korelacia medzi umelymi hormonami a rakovimou prs je mi znama aj z vlastnej skusenosti. Tato bola pred vyrobou hormonalnych prostriedkov(lieky antikoncepcie) dost zriedkava a dnes je hroziva znacnemu percentu zien.

Ak niekto najde nejake tabulky, data z minulosti na rakoviny, velmi by som to privital.

Technicke data, ktore latky sa kedy patentovali a ktore latky sa kedy zaviedli do pouzivania, to sa da najst lahsie

Data na alergie nepotrebujem, sam si pamatam z mojej mladosti v patdesiatych rokoch , ked sme boli 2 triedy cely mesiac v "skole prirody", kde sme sa spolocne stravovali a zili vo velkych ubykaciach, nepamatam sa na ziadne podstatne alergie, okrem trochu sennej nadchy.
Dnes maju v triedach tu v USA registrovane vyse 50 % deti z roznymi potravinovymi alergiami,niektore velmi vazne, tj nieco sa radikalne muselo zmenit na zamoreni a funkcii tela a zatial sa na to nepoukazuje, lebo by to zrejme siahalo na niekoho ekonomicke zaujmy.
 Ako vsade, za vsetkym dianim su zrejme peniaze....
Dovody hrciek v prsiach su casto prebytky estrogenov.(teda okrem roznych zamoreni tela)
Tamoxifen sice znizi vyrobu estrogenov, ale ma bocne ucinky velmi neprijemne, od krvnych zrazenin az po rakovinu maternice.
Na znizenie estrogenu je ovela lepsie pouzivat vytazky z kapustovin ako DIM a I3C, ktore nielenze znizia estrogenicke aktivity, ale aj su silne protirakovinne.
A nemaju ako potravinove doplnky ziadne skodlive ucinky.
Pomaha brat aj yam, jod a extra enzymi, ktore v tele odburaju rozne neziaduce utvary, vcitane rakovin.
Z prirodnych produktov pouzivanych tradicne americkymi indianmi je to hlavne Bloodroot a Goldenseal.
Nasiel som jeden z dobrych zdrojov na tieto a ine tradicne zmesy
http://bloodrootproducts.com/
Zaujimave su najme "salve" na pouzitie na rozne kozne karcinomy, ale aj vnutorne pouzitie je zaujimave, hoci kontraverzne, lebo reakcie (detox)su casto dost prudke.

Pripojim k tomu clanok dr Shalenbergera, ktory vo mne podnietil zvedavost okolo Bloodroot produktov

Volume 3, Issue 12
March 25, 2010

The $50 cure for skin cancer

With spring officially starting this week, a lot of people are ready to get outside into the sunshine. But I also hear a lot more concern during this time of year about skin cancer. In fact, I received the following letter from Ronald K. in Indianapolis, IN:

"Dr. Shallenberger, what about skin cancer on the forehead — are there any natural remedies?"

Here's my response to Ronald:

"I'm going to assume that you have a basal cell cancer. These are the most common. And I have a great remedy for them that works incredibly well (and it may work for other skin cancers as well). Basal cell cancers are very responsive to specific topical herbal treatments. The best one goes by various names including Compound X, Cowboy Salve, Black Salve, Healing Time Salve, or Indian Salve.

Can This Vegetable Fat
Rid You of Joint Pain and
Re-Build Your Cartilage?

7 international studies say "YES."
What it is and where to get it.

Read on:

"All of these herbal preparations are combinations of the herb bloodroot and zinc. The one I use has chaparral in it as well. Unfortunately, you can't get the one I use anymore. The FDA hates these salves. They've made it one of their top priorities to get rid of their manufacturers. Fortunately, there are still some around. But the formulas differ somewhat — though all of them should be effective.

"I bought a one-ounce bottle about 25 years ago, and it is still about 20% full. Since I first bought it in the Bahamas (for about $50), I have removed about 100-150 basal cells. It doesn't take much, and it works great without any side effects or scarring whatsoever.

"I know you can get the salves over the Internet. There are a lot on the market, and the salves tend to be expensive. I've seen some around the same price range, give or take $10, as what I paid 25 years ago. But they last a long time and you can use them to fight many of these cancers. So they are worth the price. Since I've used the same one all these years, I can't advise you as to which one is the best. They all should work, though."

With spring in the air, it's time to get out and enjoy the sun. Don't use sunscreens and don't get sunburned. They both can cause problems. Spend your time outside carefully. But do get outdoors. The sun is great for your health.

Finding your Real Cures,

Frank Shallenberger, MD


Copyright 2010 Soundview Publishing, LLC

If someone forwarded you this email, and you'd like to receive your own Real Cures Alert, please sign up on our website: www.RealCuresLetter.com
Cancer Defeated Newsletter
By Lee Euler
Issue #30
Why You're Receiving This
See Reminder at the end of this page

Not a subscriber yet?
Become one now. Click here.

Common Garden Plant
Doubles As A Potent Cancer Killer!

Cure Almost Any Cancer at Home for $5.15 a Day

"I hate that word 'battle' cancer, 'cause you don't have to battle it, as you'll find out," says Bill Henderson, an MBA and retired Air Force colonel. Bill knows what he's talking about. After he lost his beloved wife to cancer, he knew there HAD to be a better way than "chemotherapy hell." He set out to become an expert, and he's coached thousands of patients with all different types and stages of cancer.

Most of them recover. "Almost any kind of cancer is reversible," says Bill. "I never give up on anyone." Even more amazing, the best cancer therapy is one you can do at home for pennies! Click here and Bill will tell you himself...

Ever heard of wormwood or mugwort? Although they may sound like characters from a Harry Potter novel, they're really common names of the Artemisia annua plant that some researchers now know is an effective, natural cancer treatment.

If you're like me and enjoy gardening you probably grow some Artemisia in your beds. It doesn't produce a flower but it has beautiful silver foliage. There are many different varieties and I haven't researched whether the ones people grow at home have any medicinal uses, so don't go experimenting on yourself. This article is only about one specific species, Artemisia annua.

A fourth century handbook of Chinese medicine uncovered in 1970 showed Chinese herbalists commonly used the plant to treat fever. By 1971, scientists also demonstrated that Artemisia plant extracts were a powerful anti-malarial remedy. The studies I'm going to describe actually used extracts, not the whole leaf or root.

The research involving these extracts and cancer treatment is even more exciting than the older evidence about hay fever and malaria. Artemisia may be a good way to put cancer cells on a suicide watch!

According to a 2001 study 1 published in the journal Life Sciences, two bioengineering researchers in Seattle successfully used wormwood extracts to target and kill breast cancer cells.

In a University of Washington statement 2, research professors Henry Lai and Narendra Singh said the plant compound artemisinin is "highly toxic to the cancer cells, but has a marginal impact on normal breast cells."

In a nutshell, wormwood is a highly skilled cancer assassin. But how does it work?

Artemisinin is programmed to attack
cell abnormalities...

Scientists have shown that artemisinin reacts to high iron concentrations found in the malaria parasite.

Artemisinin has a chemical reaction with iron in cells. This produces a type of free radical that attacks cell membranes of the parasite.

After breaking down a malaria parasite's cell walls, the artemisinin compound invades the cells and kills the microbe.

Because cancer cells also have high iron concentrations, Professor Lai had a hunch that this same tactic might work on cancer cells too.

"Cancer cells need a lot of iron to replicate DNA when they divide," Lai explained. "When we began to understand how artemisinin worked, I started wondering if we could use that knowledge to target cancer cells."

Professors Lai and Singh knew that cancer cell surfaces—including breast cancer cells—have a greater amount of transferrin receptors than do healthy cells. These are the pathways that allow iron into a cell.

The researchers' goal was to pump cancer cells full of iron—then send in the infantry. They exposed normal and cancerous cells to three different compounds:

  1. Holotransferrin—to help transferrin receptors send iron into cells
  2. Dihydroartemisinin—a water-soluble form of artemisinin
  3. A combination of both compounds

The results?

There was no major difference in cells exposed to just one compound. But they noticed a dramatic effect when cancer cells received the double whammy of holotransferrin, then dihydroartemisinin…

In about eight hours, 75% of the cancer cells were gone, baby, gone. And after 16 hours nearly ALL of the cells were dead!

And get this…

Lai and Singh noticed that the vast majority of normal breast cells did NOT die! This proves the treatment selectively targets abnormal cells—and does so safely.

This was no fluke result. Other research proves artemisinin is a lethal weapon against other forms of cancer…

Wormwood pulverizes
bone marrow and throat cancers

If you're impressed with the speedy results of artemisinin against breast cancer cells—you'll be wowed at what it did to leukemia cells.

Leukemia is cancer of the blood or bone marrow. Scientists have found that leukemia cells have 1,000 times the iron concentration of normal cells. That makes them a perfect set-up for artemisinin.

In a study reported in the Cancer Letters journal 3, Dr Lai found that ALL leukemia cells exposed to the holotransferrin and dihydroartemisinin combination were destroyed within 8 hours.

That's just half the time it took to kill nearly all the breast cancer cells!

What's more, a case published in the Archive of Oncology 4 reported on a 72-year-old man with cancer of the larynx who was successfully treated with the Artemisia extract called artesunate.

The man experienced hoarseness… difficulty swallowing food… and pain in his throat and ear because of a growth on the right side of his larynx.

Researchers gave the patient artesunate injections and tablets over a period of nine months. The results?

The tumor in the man's throat was reduced by about 70% after just TWO MONTHS of treatment.

Plus, the patient regained his voice, appetite, and weight—with no adverse side effects reported!

These studies prove wormwood is an ancient Asian remedy that shows promise as an effective cancer therapy.

According to Lai, the goal is to develop an inexpensive oral treatment that can be taken on an outpatient basis.

But you can bet that such a natural, inexpensive treatment—about $2.00 per dose compared to hundreds of dollars for chemotherapy drugs—won't curry the favor of a single soul in "Big Pharma"!

Kindest regards,

Lee Euler
Publisher

1 Lai, H. and Singh, N.P. Selective toxicity of dihydroartemisinin and holotransferrin toward human breast cancer cells. Life Sciences, 70:49-56,2001
2 Harrill, R. 2001, Nov. 26. Ancient Chinese folk remedy may hold key to non-toxic cancer treatment. University of Washington. Retrieved June 8, 2010 from http://www.artemisin.org/research.html.
3 Lai, H. and Singh, N.P. Selective cancer cell cytoxicity from exposure in dihydroartemisinin and holotransferrin, Cancer Letters, 91:41-46, 1995
4 Singh, N.P. and Verma, K.B. Case report of a laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with artesunate. Archive of Oncology 2002;10(4):279-80. Retrieved June 8, 2010 from http://www.thedcasite.com/Library/Artemisinin/
Case_report_of_a_laryngeal_squamous_cell_carcinoma_treated_with_artesunate.pdf


Please tell me what you think. Send your comments and feedback to: newsletter@cancerdefeated.com

I regret that I can’t answer personal questions about your choice of treatments, doctors or clinics. I feel for you with all my heart, but I’m not a caregiver and requests for advice about what to do will not receive a response.  I urge you to read our publications to learn more about your personal treatment options.

If you need to write us about a purchase you’ve made, please email custserv@cancerdefeated.com

Thanks,
Lee

 


Health Disclaimer: The information provided above is not intended as personal medical advice or instructions. You should not take any action affecting your health without consulting a qualified health professional. The authors and publishers of the information above are not doctors or health-caregivers. The authors and publishers believe the information to be accurate but its accuracy cannot be guaranteed. There is some risk associated with ANY cancer treatment, and the reader should not act on the information above unless he or she is willing to assume the full risk.


Reminder: We're the publishers of Natural Cancer Remedies that Work, Cancer Defeated, Cancer Breakthrough USA, Missing Ingredient For Good Health, German Cancer Breakthrough and How to Cure Almost Any Cancer for $5.15 a Day. You're getting this email because you purchased one of these Special Reports and gave us permission to contact you. From time to time we'll alert you to other important information about alternative cancer treatments. If you want to update or remove your email address, please scroll down to the bottom of this page and click on the appropriate link.


Cancer Defeated
PO Box 1076,
Lexington, VA 24450

"We respect your privacy. Your name, address and other personal information will not be sold to any third parties. Any personal information you provide us is protected by state of the art security."

Questions or problems? Please email us at
custserv@cancerdefeated.com

Cancer Defeated is published by Online Publishing & Marketing, LLC,
which is solely responsible for its content.


Online Publishing & Marketing LLC

PO Box 1076
Lexington, VA
24450
US


If you no longer wish to receive communication from us:
Cancel

To update your contact information:
Update
Cancer Defeated Newsletter
By Lee Euler
Issue #43
Why You're Receiving This
See Reminder at the end of this page

Not a subscriber yet?
Become one now. Click here.

Drug Companies May Actually Possess the
Cancer Breakthrough We've Prayed for —
But They Won't Let us have It!

Have you heard the latest buzz among cancer patients?

Clinical trials and anecdotal evidence confirm that low dose naltrexone (LDN) can arrest cancer progression, reduce symptoms, and even help your body heal itself.

And patients are talking it up all over the Internet.

Burton Berkson, M.D., Ph.D., reports LDN's amazing effect on cancer, as well as arthritis, lupus, MS, and other autoimmune diseases.

What's more, LDN is inexpensive and FDA approved.

There's only one small catch...

LDN, so far, has not been approved for conditions besides dependence on alcohol and opium-derived drugs. You can still get it off-label for other purposes, but LDN is effectively being kept under wraps and most people — probably including your doctor — don't even know it exists.

Now anyone who knows me or my colleagues or this newsletter knows we don't care much for conventional drug therapies. The best evidence is that cancer is a systemic disease — that is, a disease of the whole body — that's induced by our lifestyles and the surfeit of poisons in modern, industrialized life.

But we're not going to turn our backs on something that works — drug or not. And based on my team's early investigations, LDN looks like the most promising cancer treatment I've seen in a long time.

The Stunning Power a "Mini-Dose" Can Deliver...

Naltrexone is a pharmacologically active opiate antagonist used to treat drug and alcohol addiction, typically at doses of 50mg to 300mg. It was FDA approved in 1984 for those purposes.

More recently, researchers discovered that low dosages of LDN (3 to 4.5mg) could modulate your immune system, and were valuable for successfully treating various kinds of cancer -- and a wide range of autoimmune diseases as well, including: 1

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Multiple sclerosis (MS)
  • Parkinson's
  • Fibromyalgia
  • Crohn's disease
  • Ulcerative colitis
  • Lupus
  • Diabetic neuropathy
  • Dermatomyositis (an inflammatory muscle disease)
  • Hepatitis C

One physician, Dr. Jacquelyn McCandless, even found that LDN helped children with autism.

Dr. Bernard Bihari — the discoverer of the clinical effects of LDN in humans — began to treat cancer patients with LDN in 1999. 2 Most of these patients had failed to respond to standard treatments and in many cases they were already gravely ill when first seen by Dr. Bihari.

Is chemotherapy EVER the right decision?

A few readers of this newsletter will probably send me hate mail over this little note, they're so dedicated to pure, natural treatments.

But it's a fact that chemotherapy CAN work, if it's done right. There are at least three methods of administering chemo effectively. Two of them involve the use of low doses — as little as ten percent of what the big drug companies recommend.

These two low-dose methods are used by some of the top alternative cancer clinics in Germany, Mexico and the United States — the very clinics we recommend all the time. Patients who take advantage of low-dose chemotherapy don't lose their hair or suffer nausea, and quite often they DO recover.

Of course, these alternative clinics use low-dose chemo in combination with a wide range of natural therapies. But the fact remains that chemotherapy has a place in cancer treatment when it's done right.

In one of the low-dose methods, the chemotherapeutic agent is administered while the patient is heated to the point where he or she has a "fever" — a fever that disappears as soon as the doctor turns off the machine.

The therapy is called hyperthermia, and we've written about it many times (see issue #3, for example, at www.cancerdefeatednewsletter.com). A fever weakens cancer cells, while leaving healthy cells unharmed, and during the time the cancer cells are weak a chemotherapy drug finishes them off, even at a low dose. Doctors now have sophisticated machinery to raise the body temperature for a brief time, thereby simulating a fever. Unfortunately, it's next to impossible to get hyperthermia in the United States.

You can find clinics that offer hyperthermia in Adios, Cancer, our Special Report about Mexican cancer clinics, and in German Cancer Breakthrough, our Special Report about the best German clinics. Click on either of the blue links to get more information. This sophisticated therapy is one of the top options you should consider if you have cancer.

I understand that many people prefer to treat themselves, at home, with the many do-it-yourself options available. And the home treatments can work. But I think your FIRST CHOICE should be one of the clinics in these two Special Reports, if you can possibly afford it. The price is modest compared to conventional US treatments, and in some cases your insurance will even cover it.

The clinics also perform hyperthermia using natural cancer-killers like laetrile or mistletoe extract. The doctor will help you decide which treatment is best for you — out of the many options available. That's the advantage of consulting an expert. And in Adios, Cancer and German Cancer Breakthrough we've done the work for you and sorted out which experts you can trust. By the way, it's perfectly safe to go to the Mexican clinics. They aren't a bit affected by all the violence you hear so much about.

The other method for getting good results with low-dose chemo is called IPT. The German clinics don't use it, as far as we've found, and we've visited quite a few of them. IPT is easily available in Mexico — full details in Adios, Cancer. One or two American alternative cancer clinics also offer IPT, and you can find out more about those in our Special Report Cancer Breakthrough, USA.

Although not considered a controlled clinical trial, medical records suggest that Bilhari's clinical 'off-label' use of LDN on 450 cancer patients significantly benefited more than 60% of them.

Of 354 patients with whom Dr. Bihari had regular follow-up, 86 showed at least a 75% reduction in tumor size. Another 125 patients were stabilized or moving toward remission.

This stands in sharp contrast to standard cancer treatments — surgery, radiation and chemotherapy...

Take, for example, chemotherapy... In 2004, the Journal of Clinical Oncology published a revealing study about chemotherapy's success rates. The study's authors examined how many cancer patients were still alive after 5 years. It states: The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA.

In other words, the incredible misery and bank-busting expense of chemotherapy add about two percent more days to the average patient's life. That means if a patient would have survived five years without chemotherapy, he or she can expect to live — are you ready? — five additional weeks with chemotherapy. That's right: No chemotherapy: five years. Chemotherapy: five years plus five more weeks.

And for this you lose your hair, can't eat, throw up all the time — and you accelerate our country's fast-approaching bankruptcy.

Besides that, you may well die of an infection BEFORE the five years are up because chemo trashes your immune system. And if you do die of an infection, it won't be counted as a "death from cancer." They'll write on your death certificate that the infection caused your death, never mind that chemo brought on the infection. That is, the five-year cancer survival statistics are a lie.

LDN therapy thus looks like a very promising alternative. It offers the possibility of long-term stabilization and/or gradual reduction of the size of the tumor.

If the results hold up, cancer could possibly become a manageable chronic disease with which patients could live free of symptoms — without the crippling side effects of chemo and radiation treatments.

Unfortunately, Dr. Bihari lacked up-to-date follow-up data on 96 patients. Of the other 354 patients — those for whom we know the results -- 84 died (all but 4 due to cancer-related causes). Most of these deaths occurred within the first 8-12 weeks on LDN, and were patients who were extremely ill and had exhausted all other treatment options by the time they saw Dr. Bihari.

As mentioned earlier, 86 showed a very large reduction in tumor size and another 125 showed smaller but still substantial benefit from LDN. Those who showed the best progress toward remission had never received chemo. No surprise there.

The apparent remissions among Dr. Bihari's patients included 3:

  • 2 children — neuroblastoma
  • 6 — non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • 3 — Hodgkin's disease
  • 5 — pancreatic cancer metastatic to the liver
  • 5 — multiple myeloma
  • 1 — carcinoid
  • 4 — breast cancer metastatic to bone
  • 4 — ovarian cancer
  • 18 — non-small cell lung cancer
  • 1 — small cell lung cancer
  • 5 — prostate cancer (with no prior hormone-blocking therapy

(Note: Recently-diagnosed prostate cancer patients without previous therapies appear to do well on LDN. But those with prior hormone-related therapies, including testosterone-blocking drugs and PC-Spes, were unresponsive to LDN.)

Overall, it appears plausible that about 60% of cancer patients could benefit from LDN. This is underscored by Dr. Bihari's observation that earlier treatment with LDN seemed to improve results.

The National Cancer Institute is looking into it too. In June 2002 an oncologist reviewed some 30 charts of Dr. Bihari's cancer patients (more about this in a minute). About half were said to have responded to LDN without a doubt. With patient permission, medical records went to the NCI for further analysis and for consideration for NCI's Best Case Series.

Can LDN Work as a Stand-Alone Treatment?

Dr. Bihari had 88 patients with cancer in partial or total remission whose outcome appeared to be clearly attributable to LDN alone. The LDN-only group included:

  • 5 breast cancer patients
  • 1 patient with widespread metastatic renal cell carcinoma
  • 3 Hodgkin's disease patients
  • 6 with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Other LDN-only cases — with some now on LDN for up to 4 years — include patients with:

  • Non-small cell lung cancer (a score of patients)
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Uterine cancer
  • Pancreatic cancer (treated early)
  • Untreated prostate cancer
  • Colon cancer
  • Malignant melanoma
  • Throat cancer
  • Primary liver cancer
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
  • Multiple myeloma
  • And others...

However, most of Dr. Bilhari's cancer patients were on other treatments besides LDN.

So, how exactly does LDN work?

The Amazing Value of Endorphins... a Natural Phenomenon

You've probably heard of endorphins. They're your body's 'happy pills'. They make you feel exhilarated after working out (for instance, the so-called "runner's high"), give you energy, reduce stress.

Scientifically, endorphins are neurotransmitters in your brain that regulate immune function, cell growth and pain sensation. They bind to neuroreceptors.

In simple terms that means... endorphins act like a key in a lock. They lock into the receptors and prevent pain-causing agents from sending their pain messages, much like morphine and codeine, but without the risk of addiction.

But endorphins do a whole lot more than give you a runner's high. Some people call them a natural wonder drug.

According to the Journal of Immunology, the release of endorphins can boost your immune system.

Scientists have discovered that the beta-endorphin activates NK cells (natural killer cells) which are believed to kill cancer cells. Beta-endorphins also relieve pain, reduce stress, and postpone the aging process.

LDN works by inhibiting these endorphins for a short time — resulting in a rebound effect in endorphin production.

Those higher levels then up-regulate vital elements of your immune system and promote corresponding increases in T-lymphocytes. Apparently the increase restores your normal balance of T-cells to reduce the impact of the disease.

It moves your immune response in a positive direction...

The Greatest Discovery of the 20th Century...

The potential benefit of LDN for cancer arose largely from the work of Penn State's Dr. Ian Zagon and his colleagues.

Dr. Ian Zagon and his team at Penn State University researched naltrexone and other opiate antagonists. They found that one particular endorphin, metenkephalin, inhibited cell proliferation… reducing inflammation in autoimmune and neurological disorders, and stopping cell growth in tumors.

Zagon published evidence that LDN:

  • Reduced neuroblastoma tumor incidence by 66%
  • Retarded tumor development by 98%
  • Extended survival by 36% over controls.

LDN arrested B-cell lymphoma in one published case. 4 Along with alpha-lipoic acid, it stopped metastasized pancreatic cancer for 3 years in another case. 5

Anecdotal reports of LDN causing remission include colorectal, mammary, ovarian, small-cell and non-small-cell lung, and prostate cancers, plus Hodgkins and non-Hodgkins lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and neuroblastoma.6

LDN appears promising for prostate cancer prevention and early treatment, given that all anecdotal cases not previously receiving hormonal treatments went into remission. 7

Dr. Bilhari believed LDN's anti-cancer action was due to an increase in:

  1. The number and density of opiate receptors on the tumor cell membranes — increasing their responsiveness to current levels of endorphins — in turn leading to cancer cell death.
  2. An increase in the number and activity of circulating cytotoxic (foreign-cell-killing)T-cells and NK cells.

So Why Haven't You Been Told?

Let's just say, "It's all about the money." That's about the only explanation that adds up. After all, this is a pharmaceutical drug. It's not some "wacky" herb or Chinese concoction or a mystery machine that zaps you with radio frequencies. There's no reason for conventional medicine NOT to embrace LDN except that it might destroy the chemotherapy-industrial complex.

Most likely, pharmaceutical companies shun LDN because it's so cheap and effective… plus it's off-patent so there's no incentive for them to invest money in research. As a generic drug, it offers no prospect for a huge multibillion dollar payoff.

In the past five years, I've seen plenty of evidence the drug companies don't want cheap competition to their expensive (and toxic) chemo drugs.

In today's world, your doctor likely gets almost all his knowledge of drugs from drug company reps — who will spend tens of thousands per year to motivate a doctor to prescribe the latest, most profitable (to the drug companies — not to you!) drugs available.

So unless you get this information to your doctor and insist on LDN for your treatment, you're unlikely to ever hear your doctor discuss it.

But not to fear... they are able to prescribe it.

How to Get an LDN Prescription

LDN is available by prescription only. Any physician can ethically and legally prescribe LDN as an off-label prescription.

Most doctors don't know about it, so they won't broach the subject with you.

But you have done your homework, and can print critical information from the Internet to give your doctor.

Cancer patients and those with autoimmune diseases are aggressively seeking out physicians who will prescribe it.

You will probably have to educate your doctor — here's how:

  • Give them this information
  • Refer them to www.lowdosenaltrexone.org
  • Suggest they attend one of the seminars or conferences on LDN
  • Clarify that it is compatible with other meds except narcotics or immunosuppressive drugs
  • Assure them it is free of toxicity and side effects

If your doctor won't budge, your best option is to seek a holistic physician who can prescribe it for you. You can go to the LDN-Yahoo Group for recommendations from its 4,000 members.

LDN prescriptions are usually filled at compounding pharmacies. A list of competent and reliable pharmacies can be found at www.lowdosenaltrexone.org.

Please note: You should never, ever accept a preparation of "long-acting" or "slow release" naltrexone.

Here's the Scoop on Safety...

Low dose naltrexone shows itself to be a safe and promising approach to prevention and treatment of cancer (and other diseases).

Solid evidence for the safety of long-term use of LDN was demonstrated in recent trials for Crohn's 8 and MS 9, and in more than three decades of FDA approved daily 50mg doses for alcoholism.

To date, the adverse effects from clinical studies have only amounted to temporary insomnia and vivid dreams.

However, a few warnings are in order. According to lowdosenaltrexone.org you should heed these precautions:

  • If you use narcotic medications like Ultram (tramadol), morphine, Percocet, Duragesic patch or codeine-containing meds, do NOT take LDN until those medicines are completely out of your system.
  • If you have Hashimoto's thyroiditis with hypothyroidism and you take thyroid hormone replacement, you need to start LDN at the very lowest level (1.5mg for adults). LDN can lead to a rapid decrease in the autoimmune disorder and may require a quick reduction in thyroid hormone replacement dosage to avoid symptoms of hyperthyroidism.
  • If you've had an organ transplant and are taking immunosuppressive meds permanently, you're advised against using LDN because it can counteract those medications.

www.Lowdosenaltrexone.org reports that LDN is perfectly safe to take during pregnancy and breastfeeding, and in some cases apparently lowers the rate of miscarriage. The website notes that more than 50 moms have taken it during pregnancy and lactation with no adverse effects.

Personally, I wouldn't want to take ANY drug under those conditions, but a pregnant or nursing mom who won't consider true non-drug alternatives might take a look at this new drug therapy. It certainly seems better than chemo.

In sum, LDN appears to be a very promising treatment to strengthen your immune system. It has the potential to literally turn your life around.

These are early days for this breakthrough. I'm sure there's still a lot to learn. But compared to conventional chemotherapy? No contest. I'd go for LDN.

Sources to check for further information:

www.HonestMedicine.com

www.ldners.org

www.ldn.com

www.ldnresearchtrust.org

www.KeepHopeAlive.com

www.lowdosenaltrexone.org

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/05/26/Powerful-Breakthrough-Beats-Cancer-and-AutoImmune-Diseases.aspx

http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/01/13/can-ldn-really-help-multiple-sclerosis-rheumatoid-arthritis-and-other-autoimmune-diseases.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbYC0R5uKzE&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAZ1fQKdOC8&feature=related

— Etc.

(Numerous youtube videos discuss ongoing clinical trials, speakers from professional LDN conferences, and more. Each of the above two videos will lead you to similar ones.)

Kindest regards,

Lee Euler
Publisher

ZĽAVY od iHerb pri prvom a ďaľších nákupoch!
Poštovné v akciách od 0$, bežne od 3$, v závislosti od nákupu.
Pri prvom nákupe zľava 5$ + 5% z nákupu, ak zadáte správne kódy.
Pri ďaľších nákupoch zľava 5% z aktuálneho nákupu a 5% z predošlého,
Pri každom nákupe vám pribudne kredit 5% z predošlého nákupu, ktorý môžete minúť do 2 mesiacov.
zľavový kód na 5% ZAL259
zľavový kód na 5$ APPS2018
Tu kliknite.
Name
Email
Comment
Or visit this link or this one